As reported here, Iranian government spokesman Gholan Hossein Elham said that, ""Our evaluation is that it was good, suitable and positive. In the nuclear field, the discussions were fair. Both sides supported negotiations for achieving a solution."", while at the same time, the nut job running Iran told Annan that they would not stop their enrichment program before any talks began. This way, they can continue to develop nuclear weapons technology unabated, of course.
And why is there an "impasse"? It's, of course, because "... a hardline U.S. stance was to blame for the impasse. "There is a good trend over the nuclear issue and some countries and powers like the U.S. want to turn the logical trend into illogical one," Elham said."
Sure. Blame it on the West, and more specifically the US, despite the fact that you have admitted that you have done whatever it took to deceive the rest of the world about your nuclear program; despite the fact that you kicked out the IAEA inspectors, probably due to the fact that they were getting close to 'connecting the dots' about your intentions, obtuse as they are; and despite the fact that you are currently in violation of another UNSC resolution, this one demanding that you halt your enrichment program.
Yes, the impasse is "all our fault", and you say our stance is illogical?
1 comment:
They know the UN has never done anything to people who violate the nonproliferation treaty.
Toss in some 'blame the US' for the usef ul fools to repeat and your job is done!
Who was it again that wanted Bush to use 'diplomacy' in the Mideast because all you have to do to resolve differences is 'sit down and talk it over'?
Han Solo had it right. When the person you are 'talking to' is determined to kill you no matter what, shoot first!
Post a Comment