Larry Elder gives us a very good brief history of just which political party has done the most for African Americans in this country. Can you guess which party? I'll give you a hint. It isn't the one you may think it is.
Hat tip: hollie_is_right
Sunday, November 20, 2005
Washington Farm Bureau launching new initiative
As reported here, the Washington Farm Bureau is launching a new initiative, with the hope of getting it on the 2006 ballot, that would require governments to compensate landowners impacted by regulation on the use of their property, saying this would balance out the effects of land use regulations such as the KC Critical Areas Ordinance.
Of course, the environmentalists are lining up to try to prevent this, saying this would allow anyone to do anything with their property. But, that's just not so. Zoning regulations are already in place to prevent, say, a chemical refinery being built in a residential neighborhood, so that argument, to me at least, is moot. What this new initiative would do is give control over your own property back to you, rather than government telling you what you can, or cannot, do with what you own.
Most people who own property are fully aware of what impacts their use of their property may have on their neighbors, and are smart enough to know what's a good idea, and what isn't a good idea.
Let me put it another way, using as an example something else a large majority of us own - cars. There are laws in place regulating what is acceptable - and what is not acceptable - use of a car. Most people who own a car have the intelligence to abide by those regulations. That's not to say that there are some who don't abide by those regulations, but those who don't - and get caught - face penalties for their unacceptable use of their car. The same idea applies to those who own land. There are acceptable uses for their land, just as there are unacceptable uses, and I tend to give the benefit of the doubt to land owners as to their intelligence to know the difference. I think that government should acknowledge this as well, and stop treating people as if they don't have a brain.
Of course, the environmentalists are lining up to try to prevent this, saying this would allow anyone to do anything with their property. But, that's just not so. Zoning regulations are already in place to prevent, say, a chemical refinery being built in a residential neighborhood, so that argument, to me at least, is moot. What this new initiative would do is give control over your own property back to you, rather than government telling you what you can, or cannot, do with what you own.
Most people who own property are fully aware of what impacts their use of their property may have on their neighbors, and are smart enough to know what's a good idea, and what isn't a good idea.
Let me put it another way, using as an example something else a large majority of us own - cars. There are laws in place regulating what is acceptable - and what is not acceptable - use of a car. Most people who own a car have the intelligence to abide by those regulations. That's not to say that there are some who don't abide by those regulations, but those who don't - and get caught - face penalties for their unacceptable use of their car. The same idea applies to those who own land. There are acceptable uses for their land, just as there are unacceptable uses, and I tend to give the benefit of the doubt to land owners as to their intelligence to know the difference. I think that government should acknowledge this as well, and stop treating people as if they don't have a brain.
Energetic advocacy group pushes White House agenda
So read the breathless headline for this hit piece about Progress for America, an advocacy group supporting President Bush and the Republican Party.
My question to Glen Justice and Aron Pilhofer is, why don't you do a hit piece on MoveOn and George Soros?
Oh, wait. They wouldn't do that, since MoveOn and Soros voice their sentiments! Silly me!
My question to Glen Justice and Aron Pilhofer is, why don't you do a hit piece on MoveOn and George Soros?
Oh, wait. They wouldn't do that, since MoveOn and Soros voice their sentiments! Silly me!
Sunday, November 13, 2005
And now for something lighter...
Quasimodo was checking on some of his bells in Notre Dame when he noticed one of them was missing its clapper. He removed the bell, took it to his local bell repair shop and was told to come back in a couple of days. When Quasimodo went back to get the bell, the weather was absolutely grand. The sun was shining with only a few clouds in the sky. Many of the citizens were out strolling and enjoying the day. Q was walking carrying the bell and not paying attention to where he was walking. He tripped and fell, rolling down the bank of the river and right into the water. He was able to get up and surprisingly still had hold of the bell. He then burst into song, singing, "I'm Ringin in the Seine, just ringing in the Seine..."
MSM doesn't have to verify source material?
I was listening to the radio and heard something that astonishes me. (Of course, I should not be astonished since I haven't trusted the veracity of the MSM for years.) What I heard was that people in the MSM, New York Times, CBS "News", Washington Post, etc. don't have to verify the "information" they publish as "news" any more, that the stuff needs to be proven false by the critics of the MSM. The primary focus was from a "story" concerning President Bush's final time in the guard and the forged documents from the commander of the guard unit as "reported" by Dan Blather of the CBS "Views". The woman (Mary Mapes) who was being interviewed concerning the forgeries had the absolute gall to state that she would run the story again even knowing the documents were forged since she believed the story to be "essentially true". Whatever happened to journalistic integrity? Whatever happened to rejecting stories that had little if any verification? I guess that those values don't mean much to those whose world view doesn't gibe with what the facts are. Once upon a time the news folks were the rightful watchdogs of the shadier layers of society, sadly no more from many of the MSM. Shades of the yellow journalism "news" papers such as National Enquirer and others.
Bombings in Jordan a tipping point?
As reported here, Jordanians were outraged by the recent bombing attacks in Amman, as protesters took to the streets chanting anti-terrorism slogans, and creating makeshift shrines at the sites of the bombings.
As tragic as these attacks were, perhaps this is the tipping point in the Arab world, waking them up to the fact that al Qaida will stop at nothing - including killing innocent Muslims - in their quest to bring terror to the world.
It is hoped here that this is a wake up call to moderate Arabs, and that they realize the real threat that al Qaida poses, not ony to the West, but to the entire world, and that they will finally, truly, join the fight against global terrorism.
Update: In the aftermath of the terrorist bombings in Amman carried out by Zarqawi's al-Qaida in Iraq, Jordan's King Abdullah II has called for a global fight against terrorism.
Not to try to sound too cynical, Your Highness, but what took you so long to wake up to the threat posed by al-Qaida? America has been calling for a global fight since 9/11/01. Well, I guess the old saying applies here - better late, than never. It's hoped here that you have some influence over your Arab neighbors, and can persuade them to join up in the global war on terrorism, too.
As tragic as these attacks were, perhaps this is the tipping point in the Arab world, waking them up to the fact that al Qaida will stop at nothing - including killing innocent Muslims - in their quest to bring terror to the world.
It is hoped here that this is a wake up call to moderate Arabs, and that they realize the real threat that al Qaida poses, not ony to the West, but to the entire world, and that they will finally, truly, join the fight against global terrorism.
Update: In the aftermath of the terrorist bombings in Amman carried out by Zarqawi's al-Qaida in Iraq, Jordan's King Abdullah II has called for a global fight against terrorism.
Not to try to sound too cynical, Your Highness, but what took you so long to wake up to the threat posed by al-Qaida? America has been calling for a global fight since 9/11/01. Well, I guess the old saying applies here - better late, than never. It's hoped here that you have some influence over your Arab neighbors, and can persuade them to join up in the global war on terrorism, too.
Lessons from France
David Horowitz states in plain language, so that even the dimmest of libs can understand, just what the lessons from the riots in France are - that the Islamofascists want to kill you if you don't subscribe to their cult of death.
Rival groups warring in Iraq
As reported here, according to Knight-Ridder, rival "insurgent" groups are now split, and fighting each other, with Sunni "insurgents" fighting against al-Qaida in Iraq.
al-Qaida in Iraq, led by Zarqawi, is made up mainly of foreign terrorists, and they have recently been targeting Sunni's, due to the Sunni participation in the recent referendum on the Iraqi constitution. This has infuriated the Sunni "insurgents", and apparently they have decided that they are going to fight back.
What does this mean, and should the US somehow try to encourage the Sunni's in this new development?
One thing I think it means is that the "insurgency" against the US and the fledgling Iraqi government is absolutely doomed to failure - regardless of what you read in the MSM - in that, as al-Qaida "exacts revenge" on the Sunni's for their participation in the referendum, the Sunni's may turn to the Iraqi government for assistance against Zarqawi. If this does happen (and I admit this is a big "if"), this would allow the US to concentrate more on al-Qaida in Iraq and Zarqawi, and allow the Iraqi government to turn it's attention to the Sunni "insurgents", to encourage the Sunni "insurgents" to stop fighting against the government, and instead fight against the "foreign fighters".
Whatever does actually happen in the near future, this "fratricide" between the Sunni "insurgents" and al-Qaida in Iraq can only looked upon as a positive development in the on-going fight in Iraq, one that needs to be exploited by the US and the Iraqi government.
al-Qaida in Iraq, led by Zarqawi, is made up mainly of foreign terrorists, and they have recently been targeting Sunni's, due to the Sunni participation in the recent referendum on the Iraqi constitution. This has infuriated the Sunni "insurgents", and apparently they have decided that they are going to fight back.
What does this mean, and should the US somehow try to encourage the Sunni's in this new development?
One thing I think it means is that the "insurgency" against the US and the fledgling Iraqi government is absolutely doomed to failure - regardless of what you read in the MSM - in that, as al-Qaida "exacts revenge" on the Sunni's for their participation in the referendum, the Sunni's may turn to the Iraqi government for assistance against Zarqawi. If this does happen (and I admit this is a big "if"), this would allow the US to concentrate more on al-Qaida in Iraq and Zarqawi, and allow the Iraqi government to turn it's attention to the Sunni "insurgents", to encourage the Sunni "insurgents" to stop fighting against the government, and instead fight against the "foreign fighters".
Whatever does actually happen in the near future, this "fratricide" between the Sunni "insurgents" and al-Qaida in Iraq can only looked upon as a positive development in the on-going fight in Iraq, one that needs to be exploited by the US and the Iraqi government.
Is it time to partition France?
The rioting in France, which has now spread throughout that nation, is beginning to look more and more like an intifada, much as has happened in Israel. So, what is the "solution" to this new intifada? As concerns the French, the only real course of action, as I see it, is appeasement.
And how to accomplish the appeasing of the jihadists? Why, the very same thing that the French, as well as other nations, have demanded of Israel - partition. I say that France has to be partitioned, creating an autonomous region for the jihadists to "live in peace", with Paris as the capitol of the new autonomous state. Why Paris? Why not Paris? After all, many are calling for Jerusalem to be the capitol of the Palestinian state.
What's good for the goose, is good for the gander, eh?
Hat tip: Littlebee55
And how to accomplish the appeasing of the jihadists? Why, the very same thing that the French, as well as other nations, have demanded of Israel - partition. I say that France has to be partitioned, creating an autonomous region for the jihadists to "live in peace", with Paris as the capitol of the new autonomous state. Why Paris? Why not Paris? After all, many are calling for Jerusalem to be the capitol of the Palestinian state.
What's good for the goose, is good for the gander, eh?
Hat tip: Littlebee55
Thursday, November 10, 2005
Birthday Greetings
Happy birthday wishes go out to all who are a part - past and present - of the United States Marine Corps, on this the 230th birthday of our nations elite fighting force. May you have many more!
As most of you who have been reading my posts are aware, I'm a veteran of the US Navy. As such, I will occasionally take a teasing jab or two at the Marines - it's a tradition. But I want you all to know this. I am very proud of the Marines - those who are first to fight our country's wars, who unfailingly and unflinchingly go into harms way, so the rest of us may live free.
To those who are a part of the United States Marine Corps, past and present - Semper Fidelis!
As most of you who have been reading my posts are aware, I'm a veteran of the US Navy. As such, I will occasionally take a teasing jab or two at the Marines - it's a tradition. But I want you all to know this. I am very proud of the Marines - those who are first to fight our country's wars, who unfailingly and unflinchingly go into harms way, so the rest of us may live free.
To those who are a part of the United States Marine Corps, past and present - Semper Fidelis!
Monday, November 07, 2005
As Veterans Day nears, some thoughts
I just finished reading a book called, "Hill 488", by Ray Hildreth and Charles W. Sasser (co-author of "One Shot-One Kill"), about a platoon of Recon Marines who made a valiant stand against an estimated battalion's worth of VC/NVA in Vietnam, in 1966.
At the end of the epilogue, the author is speaking many years later with another survivor of that terrible night, Bob Martinez, who said, and I quote:
"You don't have to wait until November to have Veterans Day. Every day of freedom we have is Veterans Day."
As we near Veterans Day this year, I am once again reminded of the sacrifices of the few for the many, so that we may enjoy the freedoms we have today. Without the willing sacrifice of the few, we would not have the freedoms that we do have today, that so many take for granted.
We wouldn't have the freedom of the internet (which some would take away), enabling me to post this entry in my blog, and allowing you to read it - or not.
We wouldn't have the freedom of choosing which political party to support, as we would be told which political party to support, which would in all likelihood be the only political party.
We wouldn't have the freedom of assembly with whomever we chose to assemble together with, for whatever reason.
We wouldn't have the freedom of choosing which form of religion under which to worship God, if we were so inclined to do so. We probably wouldn't be able to worship God if we wanted to.
We wouldn't have the freedom of even turning on a light, as Thomas Edison may not have had the freedom to invent it.
We wouldn't have the freedom of having cell phones, as Alexander Graham Bell may not have had the freedom to invent the telephone.
We wouldn't have the freedom of enjoying many things that we take for granted in our day to day lives, as freedom of thought would be stifled, thereby stifling the new ideas necessary for new inventions, new ways of looking at things, new ways of doing things.
But most of all, we wouldn't have the freedom of enjoying freedom.
As you go about your daily lives, take a moment to reflect on the freedoms that you enjoy (and maybe take for granted - we all do), and if by chance you happen to know, or meet up with a veteran, tell him or her "Thank you!". If you know, or meet up with someone currently in the military, tell him or her "Thank you!" - and let them know why you're thanking them!
Don't be surprised if they respond in a very humble manner (because most of us do when people tell us "Thank you!"). Just smile, and if you are so inclined, give 'em a hug, too.
To all my fellow veterans, and to those of you who are on active duty, or in the Reserves or National Guard - THANK YOU!
Your sacrifice - and being in the military is both a sacrifice and a priveledge - has allowed me to enjoy so many wonderful things in my life, which I never would have without your willing sacrifice. So, my most humble thanks to all of you.
At the end of the epilogue, the author is speaking many years later with another survivor of that terrible night, Bob Martinez, who said, and I quote:
"You don't have to wait until November to have Veterans Day. Every day of freedom we have is Veterans Day."
As we near Veterans Day this year, I am once again reminded of the sacrifices of the few for the many, so that we may enjoy the freedoms we have today. Without the willing sacrifice of the few, we would not have the freedoms that we do have today, that so many take for granted.
We wouldn't have the freedom of the internet (which some would take away), enabling me to post this entry in my blog, and allowing you to read it - or not.
We wouldn't have the freedom of choosing which political party to support, as we would be told which political party to support, which would in all likelihood be the only political party.
We wouldn't have the freedom of assembly with whomever we chose to assemble together with, for whatever reason.
We wouldn't have the freedom of choosing which form of religion under which to worship God, if we were so inclined to do so. We probably wouldn't be able to worship God if we wanted to.
We wouldn't have the freedom of even turning on a light, as Thomas Edison may not have had the freedom to invent it.
We wouldn't have the freedom of having cell phones, as Alexander Graham Bell may not have had the freedom to invent the telephone.
We wouldn't have the freedom of enjoying many things that we take for granted in our day to day lives, as freedom of thought would be stifled, thereby stifling the new ideas necessary for new inventions, new ways of looking at things, new ways of doing things.
But most of all, we wouldn't have the freedom of enjoying freedom.
As you go about your daily lives, take a moment to reflect on the freedoms that you enjoy (and maybe take for granted - we all do), and if by chance you happen to know, or meet up with a veteran, tell him or her "Thank you!". If you know, or meet up with someone currently in the military, tell him or her "Thank you!" - and let them know why you're thanking them!
Don't be surprised if they respond in a very humble manner (because most of us do when people tell us "Thank you!"). Just smile, and if you are so inclined, give 'em a hug, too.
To all my fellow veterans, and to those of you who are on active duty, or in the Reserves or National Guard - THANK YOU!
Your sacrifice - and being in the military is both a sacrifice and a priveledge - has allowed me to enjoy so many wonderful things in my life, which I never would have without your willing sacrifice. So, my most humble thanks to all of you.
Sunday, November 06, 2005
The News From Iraq That's Not Fit To Print
Jeff Jacoby lays out what the most important story from Iraq is - the ratification of the first democratic government charter in the Middle East in history - and compares that to what was reported at the same time by the leftist media as being the most important news from Iraq.
For more good news from Iraq and Afghanistan that the leftist media is not reporting, check out Aurthur Chrenkoff.
For more good news from Iraq and Afghanistan that the leftist media is not reporting, check out Aurthur Chrenkoff.
If the Problem is Muslim Terror
Victor Davis Hanson asks some pertinent questions in this piece, once again proving that he is one of America's pre-eminent thinkers.
Senate shame
Oliver North has some scathing comments directed at the US Senate, that are both warranted, and right on the mark.
For too long now, the Dems have tried every little thing they could to "bring down" a sitting President during a time of war, and each time they have pulled a little stunt such as the closed door meeting, they feed fuel to the terrorists, and dishearten those they say they "support" - the troops in the line of fire. If the Dems really supported the troops, really cared about their safety, they would not engage in stunts such as this.
But of course, they don't care about our troops at all, and they never have, no matter what comes out of their mouths. Their main goal is to bring down President Bush by any means possible. Any other consequence of their actions isn't even of secondary importance to them. It's not even on their radar screens. All they are interested in is regaining power, and the sooner the better, by any means, and it seems as if the Reps are trying to help them achieve their goal. Despicable.
For too long now, the Dems have tried every little thing they could to "bring down" a sitting President during a time of war, and each time they have pulled a little stunt such as the closed door meeting, they feed fuel to the terrorists, and dishearten those they say they "support" - the troops in the line of fire. If the Dems really supported the troops, really cared about their safety, they would not engage in stunts such as this.
But of course, they don't care about our troops at all, and they never have, no matter what comes out of their mouths. Their main goal is to bring down President Bush by any means possible. Any other consequence of their actions isn't even of secondary importance to them. It's not even on their radar screens. All they are interested in is regaining power, and the sooner the better, by any means, and it seems as if the Reps are trying to help them achieve their goal. Despicable.
Cindy for Congress?
Yes, that Cindy. They want her to move to NY, so she can run against "pro-war" Shrillary. Someone has been using too many drugs, methinks.
Hat tip: Hardcoreconservative
Hat tip: Hardcoreconservative
What the Dems said about Iraq and WMD
Glenn Beck has a whole list of qoutes of what the Dems said about Saddam possessing WMD - when they were in control of the White House. It's rather amazing to me how they can "pontificate from on high" about how "wrong" President Bush was (and still is) about the very same subject, and how that "wrongness" has led the US into the "quagmire" of Iraq.
There are really only two main differences from then to now. The Dems are no longer in control of the White House, and, President Bush decided to protect the US (and the rest of the world too, I might add) by acting decisively on the information that was available.
The Dems sat around wringing their hands over Saddam, not doing a thing about him other than to shoot a few ineffectual tomahawks his way, as opposed to the fact that President Bush, acting decisively, removed the tyrant from the world stage, freeing millions of Iraqi's from under the heel of the tyrant.
Hand wringing, and telling a tyrant "Naughty, naughty!" doesn't accomplish anything. Acting decisively on what information was available, toppled a tyrant and freed millions. Tell me truthfully - which way do you prefer? Hand wringing, or acting decisively?
Hat tip: hollie_is_right
There are really only two main differences from then to now. The Dems are no longer in control of the White House, and, President Bush decided to protect the US (and the rest of the world too, I might add) by acting decisively on the information that was available.
The Dems sat around wringing their hands over Saddam, not doing a thing about him other than to shoot a few ineffectual tomahawks his way, as opposed to the fact that President Bush, acting decisively, removed the tyrant from the world stage, freeing millions of Iraqi's from under the heel of the tyrant.
Hand wringing, and telling a tyrant "Naughty, naughty!" doesn't accomplish anything. Acting decisively on what information was available, toppled a tyrant and freed millions. Tell me truthfully - which way do you prefer? Hand wringing, or acting decisively?
Hat tip: hollie_is_right
Washington State Supreme Court at it again
As reported here, the Washington State Supreme Court - as liberal a bunch as there ever was - has created a new "class" of parents in a case of two lesbians whose relationship ended, with one suing the other over visitation rights to a child that was conceived artificially, even though she has no biological ties to the child. The Supreme Court has usurped authority from the state legislature again.
Someone needs to remind the State Supreme Court Justices of what they were supposed to have learned in Civics class about the separation of powers in government.
Someone needs to remind the State Supreme Court Justices of what they were supposed to have learned in Civics class about the separation of powers in government.
Here we go again
As reported here, there were problems again with correctly tabulating the absentee votes in the September primary, with many of the same mistakes made last November, being made again. KC Elections Director Dean Logan is again making excuses to "explain" it all away.
Here we go again.
This Tuesday is Election Day. Are there going to be the same problems again, Dean?
Never mind. I'll answer that for you - probably.
Here we go again.
This Tuesday is Election Day. Are there going to be the same problems again, Dean?
Never mind. I'll answer that for you - probably.
Justice has been served
In a previous post, I spoke about this couple tying up their kids. Well, justice has been served, as the woman received a 4 1/2 year prison sentence, which I think is fair.
KC Elections Department to get outside review
As reported here, this group supposedly will have broad authority to recommend changes in the way elections are run in KC, and "King" Sims says he will honor those recommendations.
Changes are definitely needed, and it is hoped here that positive recommendations will ensue, and be implemented. We'll see.
Changes are definitely needed, and it is hoped here that positive recommendations will ensue, and be implemented. We'll see.
"King" Sims - a gushingly breathless profile
P-I reporter Gregory Roberts positively gushes breathlessly over KC Executive "King" Ron Sims, writing at one point that "Sims' command of even arcane subjects, and especially of those germane to county government, inspires something close to awe."
Sims inspires awe? Oh, please.
With all of the problems King County has had over the past several years just in the Elections Department alone - not to mention the land grab Critical Areas Ordinance - I don't believe that Sims inspires "awe".
C'mon, Gregory - you can do better than that!
Sims inspires awe? Oh, please.
With all of the problems King County has had over the past several years just in the Elections Department alone - not to mention the land grab Critical Areas Ordinance - I don't believe that Sims inspires "awe".
C'mon, Gregory - you can do better than that!
Friday, November 04, 2005
"Global Warming is a 'Fact'", scientists say so.
I have been mulling over the broadly painted and scarcely veiled terror-engendering articles in the Seattle Times a short time ago that covered the horrible news that "global warming is a fact and that humanity is the cause". The approved solution was the signing and implementing of the Kyoto accords by the United States. Our world is in crisis and the mean old US is ignoring the dangers.... Somehow I don't see that we are to blame for every difficulty that happens around the world or even our responsibility in fixing the problems caused by natural disasters, yet we are the ones who jump in first with the most in spite of the attitudes of many of the recipient nations. The large tropical storms and hurricanes that have happened this year was seen as "proof" of global warming by my young liberal friend. I was really surprised that he did not attribute the natural disasters to President Bush. I chose not to argue. We had a lot of work to get done and I didn't think that anything would be accomplished by the conversation. I also am wondering if global warming has anything to do with the increased amount of early cold wintry weather we are experiencing so far this fall. I mean, a foot or more of snow in the Cascades already? If this is global warming the skiers/snowboarders/winter sports folks will probably take more of it. I wonder if the early snow in the mountains is a precursor to a larger amount down in the lower elevations this winter? If so, how does that equate with "warming"? Yes, I know that one or two seasons that are different don't indicate a trend, but maybe that same thought can be applied to the idea of global warming? I remember reading that during the Roman Empire, some of the best wines were from England, a reason to believe that not all warming is bad? One other thought, there are a large number of scientists in the world, many are involved with environmental things. How many of these people were asked and how many were simply ignored if their statements didn't agree with the ones calling for major changes in environmental policies?
"Pavement is forever?"
I was driving into work the other morning when I saw one of the many ridiculous bumper stickers that stand on emotionalism instead of trying to determine if the facts have something different to say. The part that stood out in my mind said that "pavement is forever"... The irony of this is that we were going by an empty parking lot that had at one time several businesses including a grocery store, gas station and a very mini mini strip mall, and is currently surrounded by a chain link fence. Where the buildings were has become filled with a variety of grasses and weeds that have poked up through the pavement. There are a couple of small trees that weren't there about five years ago when the buildings were torn down. The asphalt is still covering over 75% of the property yet is becoming hidden due to the large amount of plant life that has grown up in that area. The asphalt is cracked and broken in many places and where the cracks are there are plants. Hmmm. Just another thought, if pavement really is forever, then how come roads and parking areas have to be fixed all the time and the plants have to be poisoned out of existence????? I used to live in a city that had many trees planted by the sidewalks and the last time I was there, the sidewalks were being replaced in many areas and the trees were being cut down because the tree roots had broken the concrete. Pavement is forever, sure it is.
Sunday, October 30, 2005
Peres calls for Iran to be expelled from UN
In the wake of the outrageous comments made by the president of Iran to wipe Israel from the face of the world, Israel's Vice Prime Minister Shimon Peres says that the UN should expel Iran from the UN, although this is not the "official" policy statement of Israel in reaction to those remarks.
That is unlikely to happen, though, and to be honest, I don't think that's a good idea. Why not? Because of the possible adverse effects on the common Iranian people, and especially the dissidents who already face enough adversity as it is. From what I've been reading and hearing, there is a growing majority of Iranians who are decidely unhappy with their government, and with their governments policies, but who can't (or won't - yet) do anything about their government, due to its repressive nature. Expulsion from the UN might trigger an even more pronounced "Us vs. Them" mindset in Iran (right now, it's mainly the sentiment of the government, not necessarily that of the common people), which could possibly undo the work that the dissidents are doing.
Better than expulsion from the UN is regime change, affected by "outside interests", in support of that growing majority of disaffected Iranians, starting say, sometime after December 15th, maybe?
That is unlikely to happen, though, and to be honest, I don't think that's a good idea. Why not? Because of the possible adverse effects on the common Iranian people, and especially the dissidents who already face enough adversity as it is. From what I've been reading and hearing, there is a growing majority of Iranians who are decidely unhappy with their government, and with their governments policies, but who can't (or won't - yet) do anything about their government, due to its repressive nature. Expulsion from the UN might trigger an even more pronounced "Us vs. Them" mindset in Iran (right now, it's mainly the sentiment of the government, not necessarily that of the common people), which could possibly undo the work that the dissidents are doing.
Better than expulsion from the UN is regime change, affected by "outside interests", in support of that growing majority of disaffected Iranians, starting say, sometime after December 15th, maybe?
NOPD deserters fired
As reported here, 45 cops, and 6 civilian employees of the NOPD have been fired outright from the police department for desertion during Hurricane Katrina, while 3 others (2 cops, 1 firefighter) were rejected for employment by the Dallas PD because of allegations of desertion. The people who were fired are part of the 240 that are under investigation for going MIA during Hurricane Katrina.
The NOPD has been looked upon as the most corrupt police force in the US for a long time, due to criminal acts perpetrated by officers, both on and off duty, with the most recent allegations being that members of the force stole over 200 luxury cars to be able to leave Louisiana ahead of Hurricane Katrina.
Hopefully for the citizens of New Orleans, this investigation will weed out the worst of the offenders, and send a message to the remaining members of the force to straighten up, fly right, and act like police officers are supposed to act - preventing crime instead of committing crime!
The NOPD has been looked upon as the most corrupt police force in the US for a long time, due to criminal acts perpetrated by officers, both on and off duty, with the most recent allegations being that members of the force stole over 200 luxury cars to be able to leave Louisiana ahead of Hurricane Katrina.
Hopefully for the citizens of New Orleans, this investigation will weed out the worst of the offenders, and send a message to the remaining members of the force to straighten up, fly right, and act like police officers are supposed to act - preventing crime instead of committing crime!
"Groundswell" says change is possible
As reported here, the Christian organization, Groundswell, says that it is possible for gay/lesbian teens to change their lives, while the gay/lesbian folks angrily say it's not possible, while the moonbat leftist Ken Schram pontificates on this in his usual non-sensical way.
Let me clue you in to something folks. Through God, ALL things are possible, even becoming "straight". I personally know this to be a fact. Was I gay at one time? No, but I was a heavy drug user, with no way to stop using drugs on my own. When I turned my life over to Jesus, however, He took my need to use drugs completely away, and I have been clean since 1978, and I consider myself to be a recovered (not recovering) drug user. That was a radical change for me, in that, I lived my life to use drugs. My whole reason for being, as it were, was to get high, but I knew that if I continued down that path that my life was going to be short. As a matter of fact, I predicted - no, boasted - to my friends that I would not live past my 21st birthday. Fortunately for me, I was wrong about that, and have made it 38 years more than I once predicted/boasted.
Contrary to what the gay/lesbian advocates will have you believe, I do not believe that we are "born" gay or straight; rather, I believe that it is a choice. So, if these kids really want to choose to change their lifestyle, it is possible for them to do so.
My question to the gay/lesbian folks is, how do you know it isn't possible to change? Have you even tried? Or are you so close-minded that you won't even try?
Let me clue you in to something folks. Through God, ALL things are possible, even becoming "straight". I personally know this to be a fact. Was I gay at one time? No, but I was a heavy drug user, with no way to stop using drugs on my own. When I turned my life over to Jesus, however, He took my need to use drugs completely away, and I have been clean since 1978, and I consider myself to be a recovered (not recovering) drug user. That was a radical change for me, in that, I lived my life to use drugs. My whole reason for being, as it were, was to get high, but I knew that if I continued down that path that my life was going to be short. As a matter of fact, I predicted - no, boasted - to my friends that I would not live past my 21st birthday. Fortunately for me, I was wrong about that, and have made it 38 years more than I once predicted/boasted.
Contrary to what the gay/lesbian advocates will have you believe, I do not believe that we are "born" gay or straight; rather, I believe that it is a choice. So, if these kids really want to choose to change their lifestyle, it is possible for them to do so.
My question to the gay/lesbian folks is, how do you know it isn't possible to change? Have you even tried? Or are you so close-minded that you won't even try?
Sunni's form political bloc in Iraq
As reported here, three Sunni groups have formed a coalition to field up to 230 candidates in the upcoming elections in Iraq, deciding that they want to play the game, after all. They are also said to be trying to get "insurgents" to lay down their arms, and are pressing the US for a withdrawal. Oh, and to fill space, mention was made of the UN report due out regarding UNSCAM. What that has to do with the Sunni's participating in the upcoming elections escapes me, really, but I digress.
This is actually good news. Participation in the election process by the Sunni's gives all sides a voice in how their government is formed, and will prevent the Shiites and Kurds from having complete domination of the political process in Iraq, a situation that could have had dire consequences to the development of a true democratic form of government.
The other good news, is their attempt to persuade the "insurgents" to lay down their arms. They want the US to withdraw, right? Well, the quickest way to see that happen is if the "insurgents" quit shooting at, and blowing up, people. If they can be successful at this, and if all of the foreign terrorists are rounded up, and if the borders are more effectively sealed against the influx of more terrorists, and if the political process is allowed to fully develop, the need for a US-Coalition presence will disappear, don't you think? After all, that's why we are still there, right?
Those are all big "ifs", but the inclusion of the Sunni's in the political process is a start at dealing with all of those "ifs".
This is actually good news. Participation in the election process by the Sunni's gives all sides a voice in how their government is formed, and will prevent the Shiites and Kurds from having complete domination of the political process in Iraq, a situation that could have had dire consequences to the development of a true democratic form of government.
The other good news, is their attempt to persuade the "insurgents" to lay down their arms. They want the US to withdraw, right? Well, the quickest way to see that happen is if the "insurgents" quit shooting at, and blowing up, people. If they can be successful at this, and if all of the foreign terrorists are rounded up, and if the borders are more effectively sealed against the influx of more terrorists, and if the political process is allowed to fully develop, the need for a US-Coalition presence will disappear, don't you think? After all, that's why we are still there, right?
Those are all big "ifs", but the inclusion of the Sunni's in the political process is a start at dealing with all of those "ifs".
Judge rules against political free speech again
As reported here, the same misguided Thurston County judge has once again over stepped his bounds, ruling against KVI radio hosts Kirby Wilbur and John Carlson, and the organizers for the I-912 campaign, ruling that on air comments by Wilbur and Carlson were "in kind" campaign contributions, and must be reported to the state Public Disclosure Commission as such.
This latest ruling will be appealed to the state supreme court, of course, as this violates both the Federal and State Constitutions free speech clauses. This has chilling implications if allowed to stand, in that, if you publicly endorse an initiative, referendum, or candidate in any form of media, whether it be TV, radio, newspaper, or blog, you could be subject to campaign finance rules requiring the organizers to report what you are saying as an "in kind" political contribution, which could mean that you would be silenced by the government if they don't like what you're saying.
I for one, refuse to be silenced, and will continue to write what I feel is the truth, and will defend my ability to do so on Constitutional grounds, all the way to the Federal Supreme Court if need be.
Don't like what I write? Too bad. Deal with it!
This latest ruling will be appealed to the state supreme court, of course, as this violates both the Federal and State Constitutions free speech clauses. This has chilling implications if allowed to stand, in that, if you publicly endorse an initiative, referendum, or candidate in any form of media, whether it be TV, radio, newspaper, or blog, you could be subject to campaign finance rules requiring the organizers to report what you are saying as an "in kind" political contribution, which could mean that you would be silenced by the government if they don't like what you're saying.
I for one, refuse to be silenced, and will continue to write what I feel is the truth, and will defend my ability to do so on Constitutional grounds, all the way to the Federal Supreme Court if need be.
Don't like what I write? Too bad. Deal with it!
Mike McGavik officially announces run for Senate
As reported here, Safeco Insurance CEO Mike McGavik has officially announced his intention to run for the GOP nomination to run against current Sen. Maria "Can't-do-well".
State Dem chairman Paul Berendt says McGavik has "no chance" to defeat "Can't-do-well". Oh, really? Note to Paul - don't count your chickens before they're hatched, pal.
State Dem chairman Paul Berendt says McGavik has "no chance" to defeat "Can't-do-well". Oh, really? Note to Paul - don't count your chickens before they're hatched, pal.
Going off half cocked
Once again, the P-I Editorial Board goes off half cocked about a subject that they are intellectually clueless about, saying that recently passed legislation protecting gun manufacturers and dealers from product liability lawsuits is unnecessary.
Let me put it this way. A gun is a tool, which when properly used is as safe as any other tool. Suing a gun manufacturer or dealer because a gun is used in the perpetration of a crime, rather than suing the user of the gun, is akin to someone who, while using a hammer hits his finger instead of the nail, suing the manufacturer of the hammer or the hardware store where the hammer was purchased, instead of taking responsibility for his own inept use of the tool.
Any tool, when used properly, is safe, while any tool used improperly can be dangerous, if not deadly. But, is that the fault of the manufacturer or the dealer? No! The responsibility of the safe use of any tool rests entirely with the user, period. End of story.
Let me put it this way. A gun is a tool, which when properly used is as safe as any other tool. Suing a gun manufacturer or dealer because a gun is used in the perpetration of a crime, rather than suing the user of the gun, is akin to someone who, while using a hammer hits his finger instead of the nail, suing the manufacturer of the hammer or the hardware store where the hammer was purchased, instead of taking responsibility for his own inept use of the tool.
Any tool, when used properly, is safe, while any tool used improperly can be dangerous, if not deadly. But, is that the fault of the manufacturer or the dealer? No! The responsibility of the safe use of any tool rests entirely with the user, period. End of story.
Sunday, October 23, 2005
PETA employees indicted on animal cruelty charges
As reported here, two employees of PETA - the so-called People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals - have been indicted on 25 felony counts for cruelty to animals, after carcasses of dead dogs and cats were found improperly disposed of after being euthanized.
This is just the tip of the iceberg with these people, folks. For more detailed information regarding PETA's cruelty to animals, go here.
Hat tip - Littlebee55
This is just the tip of the iceberg with these people, folks. For more detailed information regarding PETA's cruelty to animals, go here.
Hat tip - Littlebee55
Two education reform bill proposals
From Human Events on Line, two education reform bill proposals that are interesting, especially since the NEA is already up in arms over them. Even though I don't have kids, by being a tax payer, I still have a stake in education and how it is funded. Over the last several years, we have seen literally billions of dollars wasted in failed programs (can you say Ebonics, anyone?), producing fewer properly educated children (who can read, spell and do math), while at the same time, we have seen real education reform efforts either gutted, or killed, by the NEA and local teacher unions who believe they are the sole arbiters of "quality education" for our children - when in fact, their "programs" amount to nothing more than socialized, leftist, revisionist indoctrination, crammed down our childrens throats by former leftist hippies who can't, or won't, get an honest job anywhere else.
Do you want to see real change in public education? Do you want more choice as to where you send your children, and how that choice is paid for? Then contact your representatives in Congress, and tell them that you want them to support both of these bills. If they hesitate to do so, remind them of their own words about the need for "quality education" for our children, and tell them to put their money where their mouth is.
These are OUR children, and this is OUR money, not the NEA's or the local teachers unions, and WE should have a say in where our children are educated, and how that education is paid for, not non-representative organizations who are really only looking out for themselves, and not our children's, nor our nations, best interests.
Do you want to see real change in public education? Do you want more choice as to where you send your children, and how that choice is paid for? Then contact your representatives in Congress, and tell them that you want them to support both of these bills. If they hesitate to do so, remind them of their own words about the need for "quality education" for our children, and tell them to put their money where their mouth is.
These are OUR children, and this is OUR money, not the NEA's or the local teachers unions, and WE should have a say in where our children are educated, and how that education is paid for, not non-representative organizations who are really only looking out for themselves, and not our children's, nor our nations, best interests.
What a tangled web
On-going UNSCAM investigations are turning up a very tangled web of deceipt, subterfuge, money laundering, and links - if only financial - between Saddam's regime and Al-Queda. If the information discovered by Fox News' investigation pans out, proving a concrete link between Saddam and terrorists, this will prove to be a signifigant "smoking gun" that probably won't make it to the front pages of the MSM.
SR 99 Viaduct and SR 520 floating bridge ready to fail?
As reported here, and as I have mentioned before, both of these structures are in dire need of, not just repair but, replacement. According to state government sources, I-912 which would repeal the latest gas tax increase imposed by the Dem dominated legislature, would make repair or replacement of these vital roadways virtually impossible. But that isn't necessarily correct, as John Carlson points out in this op-ed piece.
I fully agree that both of these roadways do need to be replaced, as they are both disasters waiting to happen. However, I do not believe that an increase in the already 28 cent per gallon gas tax is the way to go to get these bridges replaced. Rather, I believe that better prioritization of the spending of funds already raised through the current 28 cent per gallon tax is the way to go.
Our legislators, and state agencies, have consistently refused to look at cutting costs first, before asking for more money for pet projects. I cannot tell you how many times I have driven past road construction in progress, and have seen one person working, while two or more others have been standing there "supervising" the one who is doing the work. As with most government agencies, I believe that there is a problem of being "top heavy" with mid-management level employees, "supervising" too few people who are actually doing the work. Labor costs being what they are, I'm sure that if the bloated employee rolls were cut, there could be a signifigant savings realized.
Private businesses are constantly looking for ways to improve efficiency, and to cut costs. Why can't the government do the same? Yes, fix the 520 floating bridge and the Viaduct, but do it within the revenue already being generated!
I fully agree that both of these roadways do need to be replaced, as they are both disasters waiting to happen. However, I do not believe that an increase in the already 28 cent per gallon gas tax is the way to go to get these bridges replaced. Rather, I believe that better prioritization of the spending of funds already raised through the current 28 cent per gallon tax is the way to go.
Our legislators, and state agencies, have consistently refused to look at cutting costs first, before asking for more money for pet projects. I cannot tell you how many times I have driven past road construction in progress, and have seen one person working, while two or more others have been standing there "supervising" the one who is doing the work. As with most government agencies, I believe that there is a problem of being "top heavy" with mid-management level employees, "supervising" too few people who are actually doing the work. Labor costs being what they are, I'm sure that if the bloated employee rolls were cut, there could be a signifigant savings realized.
Private businesses are constantly looking for ways to improve efficiency, and to cut costs. Why can't the government do the same? Yes, fix the 520 floating bridge and the Viaduct, but do it within the revenue already being generated!
Encouraging news in the fight against breast cancer
As reported here, the cancer fighting drug, Herceptin, which has been used for late stage breast cancer treatment, shows promise in treating early stage breast cancer. Although some have used the word "cure", I believe that it is too early to unequivocally say that, as the studies used were of short duration, but this is a welcome advance in the fight against one of the leading causes of death for women.
Kudos to Genentech!
Kudos to Genentech!
Iraqi's more confident in themselves
Michael Rubin explains why Iraqi's are more confident in themselves than most American pundits and policy makers are.
Most of the news we hear from Iraq is totally negative. Car bombs, the daily litany of Americans giving their lives for the sake of freedom (although it isn't expressed in that manner by the MSM, of course), so-called "insurgents" (read terrorists, the word that must never be said or printed by the MSM - wouldn't want to upset them now, would we?) attacking Iraqi Army and Police recruiting stations, etc., etc., ad nauseum. These are the things that are being looked at by the so-called "experts", and by the policy makers, and because of the negativity, many of them are on the verge of panic, and demanding that President Bush set a definite withdrawal date.
And yet, the truth of the matter is this. Iraqi's have confidence in themselves, and in their political process succeeding. How so? As Mr. Rubin points out, hundreds of thousands of Iraqi's who had fled the Saddam regime are returning. People who lack confidence flee the situation, not return. The Iraqi real estate market is booming. People lacking confidence in a situation buy gold and jewels, which can be easily hidden for when they flee. They don't buy real estate if they have no confidence that the law will protect their investment. Foreign investment is up, and will continue to grow. The Iraqi's also recently turned out in the millions to vote on their country's new constitution, establishing a democratic form of government. People with no confidence would not have voted.
That is the truth in Iraq, and why the Iraqi people are more confident in themselves than the American pundits, the so-called "experts", and the policy makers.
Most of the news we hear from Iraq is totally negative. Car bombs, the daily litany of Americans giving their lives for the sake of freedom (although it isn't expressed in that manner by the MSM, of course), so-called "insurgents" (read terrorists, the word that must never be said or printed by the MSM - wouldn't want to upset them now, would we?) attacking Iraqi Army and Police recruiting stations, etc., etc., ad nauseum. These are the things that are being looked at by the so-called "experts", and by the policy makers, and because of the negativity, many of them are on the verge of panic, and demanding that President Bush set a definite withdrawal date.
And yet, the truth of the matter is this. Iraqi's have confidence in themselves, and in their political process succeeding. How so? As Mr. Rubin points out, hundreds of thousands of Iraqi's who had fled the Saddam regime are returning. People who lack confidence flee the situation, not return. The Iraqi real estate market is booming. People lacking confidence in a situation buy gold and jewels, which can be easily hidden for when they flee. They don't buy real estate if they have no confidence that the law will protect their investment. Foreign investment is up, and will continue to grow. The Iraqi's also recently turned out in the millions to vote on their country's new constitution, establishing a democratic form of government. People with no confidence would not have voted.
That is the truth in Iraq, and why the Iraqi people are more confident in themselves than the American pundits, the so-called "experts", and the policy makers.
Sunday, October 16, 2005
'Help! Mom!' casts liberals as villains
As reported here, a new children's book describes liberals as villians. Well, aren't they?
Maybe not all "progressive" liberals, but their national agenda is villanous in many ways, certainly anti-American at the least, eh?
Oh, and note how the lib-whiners mention the word 'Nazi' in their crying about this book. If they can't offer up a substantive, logical, argument against something, they resort to invoking the 'Nazi' word. How 'tolerant' of you to do that.
Note to libs - Nazi stands for National Socialism, so that old, evil, doctrine is more closely attuned to your old, tired, and in many ways evil, Socialist doctrines. Quit using that appelation when talking about Conservatives, or our opinions.
Maybe not all "progressive" liberals, but their national agenda is villanous in many ways, certainly anti-American at the least, eh?
Oh, and note how the lib-whiners mention the word 'Nazi' in their crying about this book. If they can't offer up a substantive, logical, argument against something, they resort to invoking the 'Nazi' word. How 'tolerant' of you to do that.
Note to libs - Nazi stands for National Socialism, so that old, evil, doctrine is more closely attuned to your old, tired, and in many ways evil, Socialist doctrines. Quit using that appelation when talking about Conservatives, or our opinions.
Many on KC voter rolls twice?
Many on KC voter rolls twice? According to the state GOP, there are over 2,000 people registered twice, conceivably allowing them to also vote twice, unless the voter rolls are corrected. Embattled KC Elections Director Dean Logan says the GOP is on a "witch hunt", and says that he hasn't seen the information the GOP has to base their claims on.
Hey, Dean! You're in charge of the Elections Department (just in case you forgot), therefore you have access to ALL of the voter rolls in KC. Why don't you use "due diligence" and check them yourself? Or, at least have someone competent in your department do it. Oh, wait - that's presupposing that you have anyone competent in your department that could do that. Never mind. Silly me!
Hey, Dean! You're in charge of the Elections Department (just in case you forgot), therefore you have access to ALL of the voter rolls in KC. Why don't you use "due diligence" and check them yourself? Or, at least have someone competent in your department do it. Oh, wait - that's presupposing that you have anyone competent in your department that could do that. Never mind. Silly me!
More thoughts on the UN's desire to control the Internet
After posting about this insanity here, and here, I found this rather amusing nugget of an opinion by Silent Running here.
I don't think I could have said it any better.
Hat tip: agtiger
I don't think I could have said it any better.
Hat tip: agtiger
Well, it's a start
As reported here, the King County Council has forwarded their election reform proposal to KC Executive Ron "King" Sims.
Will Sims sign off on it? All I can give you is a "maybe".
Will Sims sign off on it? All I can give you is a "maybe".
Guilty as charged
Religion of Peace?
Defenders of Islam constantly carp about how non-Muslims keep bringing up the fact that many (if not most) terrorists are Muslim, and therefore by extrapolation, that Islam is not a peaceful religion, making the arguement that Islam is the "Religion of Peace".
If Islam truly is the "Religion of Peace", then why are so many Muslims terrorists? You doubt me on that? Then you need to go here, to see the list of terrorist acts perpetrated by members of the so-called "Religion of Peace".
The "Religion of Peace"? Hardly.
Hat tip: Littlebee55
If Islam truly is the "Religion of Peace", then why are so many Muslims terrorists? You doubt me on that? Then you need to go here, to see the list of terrorist acts perpetrated by members of the so-called "Religion of Peace".
The "Religion of Peace"? Hardly.
Hat tip: Littlebee55
Friday, October 14, 2005
Why the Libs don't seem to listen.
I have a young friend who is a liberal. I call him a friend because he is someone who has chosen to be friendly in spite of our political differences. He does try to influence me at various times and is puzzled that I seem to have more questions for him that he can't answer (or won't) without the leftist mantra showing up. He is also puzzled that I haven't started to yell and scream or lose my sense of humor while also trying to influence him. I have not been able to get him to acknowledge some things about conservative values aren't totally outside the realms of making sense. I was somewhat struck by the mantra of the left when he spoke about leaving this country for another because the policies of this country are "insane". I asked what came to mind and he immediately spoke of the "obscenity laws". When I asked him about them he spoke about the "parent's responsibility being to protect children and not society". He said it again even when I brought up the idea that children are preyed upon at the library by pedophiles. I also expressed my opinion that pedophiles out to have certain things done to them. I was unable to point out that society has put restrictions on free speech under several circumstances, most notably the yelling "fire" in a crowded theater, because I couldn't remember it. He made a comment about not having children because of the "over population of the world" that I had to let go due to our seperating and going our own ways at the end of the day's work. I think that he might just end up going to another country and finding out that the freedoms that he has taken for granted here in the US are not as freely given in other parts of the world, nor are they expected by the people. It is really sad to me, to think that there are people who allow others to think for them until their noses are rubbed in the problems. I remember one line about a liberal being someone who hasn't been mugged yet. He even piped up about the 2nd amendment and not liking it and him thinking that I would be in the same group that supposedly likes the 2nd better than the first... One answer to my title seems to me to be that they are content to look at things from the standpoint of their own limited experience and depend on others to think for them. Facts and complete information about things don't seem to influence a liberal since they belive what they "feel" to be the "truth".
Sunday, October 09, 2005
World Wide (Web) Takeover (Update)
This is an update to my previous post. As reported here, the UN wants the US to relinquish control of the Internet, so that they can run it. This would be a disaster of epic proportions, in light of UNSCAM, Darfur, Rwanda, etc., etc., etc. Fortunately, President Bush has given the UN his answer. A resounding NO!
But the future is uncertain in light of the fact that President Bush will be leaving office in 2008. Who will his successor be, and will he also tell the UN where to get off, or will he gleefully turn control of the Internet over to the scoundrels, cad, and knaves at the UN?
This is serious stuff, folks. Contact your representatives, and demand that legislation be enacted to prevent this.
Hat tip: Jay the Bear, over at Bear Politics.
Further update - "The Independant" also weighs in on this, here.
But the future is uncertain in light of the fact that President Bush will be leaving office in 2008. Who will his successor be, and will he also tell the UN where to get off, or will he gleefully turn control of the Internet over to the scoundrels, cad, and knaves at the UN?
This is serious stuff, folks. Contact your representatives, and demand that legislation be enacted to prevent this.
Hat tip: Jay the Bear, over at Bear Politics.
Further update - "The Independant" also weighs in on this, here.
Good Samaritans may face charges
As reported here, two gentlemen who tried to stop a car thief by ramming the stolen vehicle with their vehicles, may face charges of their own. Police are mulling things over, and are having a hard time figuring out if these guys are heroes for what they did, or if they should be brought up on charges.
I think they should be thanked, myself. Too few people today are willing to assist the police anymore, thinking, "It's not my problem. Let the cops handle it." Let's face it folks. There are too few cops out there, and far too many criminals who are getting away with far too many crimes. We need to stand up and be counted.
To the Eastside police agency's, I say, just say "Thank you for trying to help." to the two guys, and let it go at that.
I think they should be thanked, myself. Too few people today are willing to assist the police anymore, thinking, "It's not my problem. Let the cops handle it." Let's face it folks. There are too few cops out there, and far too many criminals who are getting away with far too many crimes. We need to stand up and be counted.
To the Eastside police agency's, I say, just say "Thank you for trying to help." to the two guys, and let it go at that.
Matt Margolis has started a new web site
Want to know what kind of shadiness your Dem representative or senator is up too? Check it out - it's all there in black and white, at No Agenda.
Hat tip - Hollie_is_right
Hat tip - Hollie_is_right
Put a lid on the LID
As reported here, assessments on property owners along the planned South Lake Union street car trolley line apparently are way out of line. Some also fear their property taxes will go up as well.
The city is run by Dems, and they love taking and spending other people's money on projects that will benefit how many people?
If this project comes to life, the Dems will be reaching as far into the property owners, as well as the taxpayers, pockets as they can. Will the property taxes go up as well? You think?
Put a lid on the LID!
The city is run by Dems, and they love taking and spending other people's money on projects that will benefit how many people?
If this project comes to life, the Dems will be reaching as far into the property owners, as well as the taxpayers, pockets as they can. Will the property taxes go up as well? You think?
Put a lid on the LID!
Is it time for England to change its' national flag?
As reported here, some think it is. Why? Because the red cross portion of the flag offends Muslims, because that is what English Crusaders wore during the Crusades. The Crusades happened several hundred years ago! Get over it!
What about the huge list of things about Muslims that offend me, such as forcing women to wear burka's; not allowing girls to be educated; female genital mutilation; arranged marriages; not assimilating themselves into the culture of their adopted countries, while forcing people in those countries to change their culture to suit Muslims? Killing innocent men, women, and children simply because they are not Muslims? What about these things? I could go on, and on, but I think I've made my point.
Because these things offend me, I demand that they stop doing them now! Seems reasonable to me.
Hat tip: lgf, via hollie_is_right
What about the huge list of things about Muslims that offend me, such as forcing women to wear burka's; not allowing girls to be educated; female genital mutilation; arranged marriages; not assimilating themselves into the culture of their adopted countries, while forcing people in those countries to change their culture to suit Muslims? Killing innocent men, women, and children simply because they are not Muslims? What about these things? I could go on, and on, but I think I've made my point.
Because these things offend me, I demand that they stop doing them now! Seems reasonable to me.
Hat tip: lgf, via hollie_is_right
A picture of intolerance
As reported here, Ken Potts, a local Shoreline resident, veteran of the 101st Airborne Division with 3 tours in Vietnam, has been targeted for being a patriot, by vandals.
This is how Liberals show their "tolerance" of diverse viewpoints?
This is how Liberals show their "tolerance" of diverse viewpoints?
Giuliani mulls running in 2008
As reported here, former Mayor of New York, Rudy Giuliani is thinking about whether to run for the Republican nomination for President in 2008.
I've been waiting for a while now to hear some names mentioned, and the possibility of Giuliani throwing his hat in the ring is very pleasing indeed!
On a side note, as a former Navy firefighter, I'd like to extend my thanks to the Danish firefighters who felt compelled to raise money for their FDNY brothers. Way to go guys!
I've been waiting for a while now to hear some names mentioned, and the possibility of Giuliani throwing his hat in the ring is very pleasing indeed!
On a side note, as a former Navy firefighter, I'd like to extend my thanks to the Danish firefighters who felt compelled to raise money for their FDNY brothers. Way to go guys!
Sunday, October 02, 2005
IFC Museum plans brought down
This past week, NY Gov. Pataki nixed the planned IFC at Ground Zero, saying the so-called "Freedom Center" Museum could be built elsewhere, but not right at Ground Zero (which caused the board of the IFC to pout, and say that they wouldn't build it at all - which is great, imo!).
Whatever articles that may appear in print, are going to be touting Gov. Pataki as the prime force of the ouster of this planned abomination, but in reality, the prime force behind the ouster (Gov. Pataki just made it official) is a West Chester, NY widow, wife of the pilot of the plane that flew into the Pentagon on 9/11.
Meet Debra Burlingame.
Thank you so much for all of your hard work and determination, Debra!
Whatever articles that may appear in print, are going to be touting Gov. Pataki as the prime force of the ouster of this planned abomination, but in reality, the prime force behind the ouster (Gov. Pataki just made it official) is a West Chester, NY widow, wife of the pilot of the plane that flew into the Pentagon on 9/11.
Meet Debra Burlingame.
Thank you so much for all of your hard work and determination, Debra!
UN wants to control the Web?
Let me repeat that - The UN wants to control the Web?! According to this article, the International Telecommunications Union of the UN says it is ready, willing and able to take control of the Internet, should the US relinquish control. This would be a disaster of major proportions, effectively bringing to a grinding halt the freedoms enjoyed through the web.
Forget the McCain-Feingold Act, where bloggers may run afoul of campaign "reform" laws by touting a political campaign or cause. That's nothing compared to this! If the ITU gets it's way, free speech as we know it on the web will cease to exist, political or otherwise.
Although the Bush Administration has told the ITU that their idea is "unacceptable", and won't happen, we are one Dem administration away from seeing it happen.
Hat tip: Jay D. Dyson at Sacred Cow Burgers.
Forget the McCain-Feingold Act, where bloggers may run afoul of campaign "reform" laws by touting a political campaign or cause. That's nothing compared to this! If the ITU gets it's way, free speech as we know it on the web will cease to exist, political or otherwise.
Although the Bush Administration has told the ITU that their idea is "unacceptable", and won't happen, we are one Dem administration away from seeing it happen.
Hat tip: Jay D. Dyson at Sacred Cow Burgers.
It's moral vacuity
The Bush bashing, anti-American, military hating, soft on Saddam, terrorism enabling MSM is taken to task in this excellent opinion piece by Clifford D. May.
"Dan the Man" has retired
It's been a while since I've posted anything about any of the local Seattle sports teams, but when I read this article, I had to.
Seattle Mariner's catcher, Dan Wilson - the last player from the 1995 team that ensured baseball would stay in Seattle - played his last game, catching the last pitches from his friend Jamie Moyer. Jon Paul Morosi of the P-I writes a very poignant piece.
Dan - thank you. Your class act will be missed.
Seattle Mariner's catcher, Dan Wilson - the last player from the 1995 team that ensured baseball would stay in Seattle - played his last game, catching the last pitches from his friend Jamie Moyer. Jon Paul Morosi of the P-I writes a very poignant piece.
Dan - thank you. Your class act will be missed.
Roberts confirmed as 17th Chief Justice
As reported here, the Senate overwhelmingly confirmed Judge John Roberts to be the new Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Half of the Dems voted for, while half voted against. Roberts is only 50, so he should serve for decades, which must really be torqueing off the Dems. Too bad. We've had to put up with Ginsburg for how long, now?
Great line in the article - "The vote reflected deep angst and disarray among Democrats ..." - which pretty much sums up the party as a whole, don't you think? Deep angst and disarray.
Great line in the article - "The vote reflected deep angst and disarray among Democrats ..." - which pretty much sums up the party as a whole, don't you think? Deep angst and disarray.
Mayor accused of misusing office
As reported here, the The Mayor of Seattle has had charges filed against him by the City Ethics and Elections Committee for using city resources to produce and mail out what they charge is campaign material. Mayor Nichols is up for re-election this year, and his eight page booklet, according to the description of it in the article, screams "It's all about ME!".
Of course, the Mayors office is disputing this, saying they're baffled by the charges.
In my opinion, that kind of neatly sums up the Mayors office - baffled.
Of course, the Mayors office is disputing this, saying they're baffled by the charges.
In my opinion, that kind of neatly sums up the Mayors office - baffled.
Parents surprised by college loophole
As reported here, the Solomon Act, and the No Child Left Behind Act, provide military recruiters with contact information of students. Where the NCLB allows for parents of high school aged children to opt out of sharing contact information, the Solomon Act which covers colleges, does not have an opt out option, so, some people are getting surprised by calls from recruiters when their kids enrol in college. ("Oh, no! It's an evil military recruiter calling!!! What ever are we going to do?????")
But, colleges are legally required to provide the fact that recruiters will have access to contact information, and they do so in college handbooks and course catalogs. Parents who actually take the time to read these would find this out, and not be surprised, don't you think?
But, colleges are legally required to provide the fact that recruiters will have access to contact information, and they do so in college handbooks and course catalogs. Parents who actually take the time to read these would find this out, and not be surprised, don't you think?
Flight 93 memorial conspiracy?
Recently, I received an e-mail from fellow blogger Alec Rawls, regarding my post of Michelle Malkins op-ed piece about the proposed Flight 93 Memorial design, which incorporates a red crescent of trees; as most people are aware, the Red Crescent is a Muslim symbol.
In his e-mail, Mr. Rawls presented - in great detail, I might add - things about the proposed Flight 93 Memorial that seem to scream CONSPIRACY! For example, there were 40 people on board flight 93 that were killed by 4 terrorists (or is it the other way around?), and in the proposed design, there are fourty four translucent blocks - blocks intended to honor the fallen. Why 44 blocks, and not just 40? Who are the extra 4 blocks in memory of, if not the terrorists?
Mr. Rawls has raised this, as well as many other intriguing questions in this post. Please take a look.
Conspiracy to honor terrorists? You decide.
UPDATE
Apparently, wiser heads have prevailed, and the design will be modified.
Hat tip: Jimmy Akin
In his e-mail, Mr. Rawls presented - in great detail, I might add - things about the proposed Flight 93 Memorial that seem to scream CONSPIRACY! For example, there were 40 people on board flight 93 that were killed by 4 terrorists (or is it the other way around?), and in the proposed design, there are fourty four translucent blocks - blocks intended to honor the fallen. Why 44 blocks, and not just 40? Who are the extra 4 blocks in memory of, if not the terrorists?
Mr. Rawls has raised this, as well as many other intriguing questions in this post. Please take a look.
Conspiracy to honor terrorists? You decide.
UPDATE
Apparently, wiser heads have prevailed, and the design will be modified.
Hat tip: Jimmy Akin
Sunday, September 25, 2005
Don't get stuck on stupid
David Limbaugh (another of my favorite bloggers), uses Gen. Russell Honore's classic admonition to reporters, "Don't get stuck on stupid.", to bring the Dems to task in this article at Townhall.
The Sound and the Fury
Edward Morrissey (Captain Ed at Captains Quarters - one of my favorite bloggers) once again skewers the silly moonbats in this article on the Senate Judical Committee hearings for Judge John Roberts.
GAO report released
As reported here, the GAO released it's report on who it sees as the largest threat to the US and the West in the GWOT, and it unapologetically names Islamic extremism as the largest threat.
This will surely prompt great wailing and gnashing of teeth among the liberals andterrorism enablers Muslim apologists, don't you think?
This will surely prompt great wailing and gnashing of teeth among the liberals and
Hamas latest Darwin Awards contestants?
The Darwin Awards are given to those people who remove themselves from the human gene pool in spectacular ways. As reported here, apparently Hamas is now vying for one of the coveted awards.
Unfortunately, the idiots who blew themselves up also killed a large number of Palestinian children, which is tragic.
Unfortunately, the idiots who blew themselves up also killed a large number of Palestinian children, which is tragic.
ELF targeted by Seattle FBI
As reported here, ELF, the domestic eco-terrorist Earth Liberation Front group, which operates in secrecy has become a top priority of the Seattle FBI office, with the Building Industry Association of Washington throwing in a $100,000.00 reward to help.
Since 1996, it is estimated that arsons committed by ELF has cost over $8 million in damages, and there are fears that eventually someone will be hurt or killed through the actions of these domestic terrorists. The most recent activity of the group is acts of arson in new housing developments in the Seattle suburbs of Sammamish and Redmond.
Now, here's what's wrong - beyond the actual crime, that is - with the activities of ELF. They are supposedly committing these acts to "protect the environment", specifically trees, right? Well, every time these numbnuts burn down a house, guess what happens? The builder replaces what was burned down. How does the builder do that? By purchasing more lumber. Where does lumber come from? Trees, perhaps? So ... protesting against the use of trees for lumber by burning down new houses, causing more lumber to be used to rebuild what was destroyed?
Their "logic" escapes me.
Since 1996, it is estimated that arsons committed by ELF has cost over $8 million in damages, and there are fears that eventually someone will be hurt or killed through the actions of these domestic terrorists. The most recent activity of the group is acts of arson in new housing developments in the Seattle suburbs of Sammamish and Redmond.
Now, here's what's wrong - beyond the actual crime, that is - with the activities of ELF. They are supposedly committing these acts to "protect the environment", specifically trees, right? Well, every time these numbnuts burn down a house, guess what happens? The builder replaces what was burned down. How does the builder do that? By purchasing more lumber. Where does lumber come from? Trees, perhaps? So ... protesting against the use of trees for lumber by burning down new houses, causing more lumber to be used to rebuild what was destroyed?
Their "logic" escapes me.
Seattle City Council gets tough with Mayor
As reported here, after mounting frustration in the City Council over getting timely information from the Mayors office and city departments, the City Council voted as one voice to make changes to force the issue.
I seem to remember Mayor Nichols saying that he would be running a "transparent" administration. Transparency in government means the free sharing of information, Mr. Mayor.
I seem to remember Mayor Nichols saying that he would be running a "transparent" administration. Transparency in government means the free sharing of information, Mr. Mayor.
New book promotes sex with children
As reported here, there is a new book out that is promoting pederasty as being "normal". Written by so-called PhD "experts", who try to "pimp" pederasty, or sexual relations between adult men and adolescent boys, citing the Greeks, Romans, and Japanese Samurai, saying that "it can be a form of mentoring".
Mentoring? You call the act of sodomy on a young boy by an adult male a form of mentoring? I call it an abnormal crime of the worst sort!
Hat tip: Littlebee55
Mentoring? You call the act of sodomy on a young boy by an adult male a form of mentoring? I call it an abnormal crime of the worst sort!
Hat tip: Littlebee55
Mariners, Mariners, wherefore art thou?
The Seattle Mariners have managed to put together two pathetic seasons in a row. They lost to another pathetic team on Saturday, and it will be a toss up if they will win against Detroit today. After a season (is it really only three before this one?) where they set a record and then went on to ignominy by not getting to the World Series, how have they fallen so far? I have been a Mariners fan since they became a member of the American League. I was privileged to sing the National Anthem for them before the start of several games while they played in the Kingdome. I was one of those who kept thinking, "maybe next year in the above .500 club". When they became the American League West champions I was moved to buy the video about the season. When they moved into "the Safe" I was excited and have attended many games there. But last year I was so disappointed in the team that I stopped watching the games on TV and stopped listening to the games on the radio in July. I almost have done the same thing this year. After seeing several games with the new young players taking over for the creaky old folks and seeing some good games (as well as some terrible ones) I am starting to think that maybe next year...
Saturday, September 24, 2005
Freeway entrance for just busses?
I found out a couple of days ago that there is a freeway onramp from the Lynnwood park and ride that is limited to just busses. This strikes me as a monumental waste of our money. The figure that I heard was $17 million. That amount doesn't strike me as being such a problem, just that it is not being used for anything other than "mass transit". If the busses are usually half full when they stop at a park and ride, then the number of people on the bus total about 15 to 20. If there are 150 uses of the ramp by the busses each day then about 3000 people use the ramp. I can think of many ramps that could have been built that would have enabled many more than just 3000 to get on the freeway...
This brings to mind, what is the Dept of Transportation really trying to do? Somebody's idea of "improving" the uses of the freeway by "encouraging" people to get on a bus? What kind of improvements can there be by trying to get people to use the least convenient form of transportation available? If I have a story (and I do, actually more than one)about the Metro bus system's ineptitude in providing anything approaching convenience, then there are probably at least two for everyone who has been forced to depend on Metro and quite possibly several even from those who choose to ride the bus.
Before anyone takes aim at me for implying problems for riding the bus, please understand that I would use the bus if I had a job downtown unless I had paid (by the company) parking where I worked. The city of Seattle has done a masterful job in limiting parking places downtown and making it super expensive to even park for a short period of time. Not to mention the length of time that one can park in a spot should one be available. I had a job that required me to park on the street in Seattle in order to repair computers in various places and sometimes I was risking getting a parking ticket simply because the repair took longer than 1.75 hours. Since I was paid per job, the thought of getting a parking ticket was a negative incentive for doing my best work. I also have no problem with those who choose to work downtown or nearby environs and use the bus to get there.
I suppose that I am just thinking in terms of DOT providing their services for the larger number of commuters since the money for the ramp came from those who pay the gas taxes, and to a much smaller percentage of those who use bus. But why would that be of any consequence to the DOT's choices in how the gas tax is spent? After all, none of them are elected or are fireable? I have often joked about getting job with the DOT so that I wouldn't have to work until I retired...
This brings to mind, what is the Dept of Transportation really trying to do? Somebody's idea of "improving" the uses of the freeway by "encouraging" people to get on a bus? What kind of improvements can there be by trying to get people to use the least convenient form of transportation available? If I have a story (and I do, actually more than one)about the Metro bus system's ineptitude in providing anything approaching convenience, then there are probably at least two for everyone who has been forced to depend on Metro and quite possibly several even from those who choose to ride the bus.
Before anyone takes aim at me for implying problems for riding the bus, please understand that I would use the bus if I had a job downtown unless I had paid (by the company) parking where I worked. The city of Seattle has done a masterful job in limiting parking places downtown and making it super expensive to even park for a short period of time. Not to mention the length of time that one can park in a spot should one be available. I had a job that required me to park on the street in Seattle in order to repair computers in various places and sometimes I was risking getting a parking ticket simply because the repair took longer than 1.75 hours. Since I was paid per job, the thought of getting a parking ticket was a negative incentive for doing my best work. I also have no problem with those who choose to work downtown or nearby environs and use the bus to get there.
I suppose that I am just thinking in terms of DOT providing their services for the larger number of commuters since the money for the ramp came from those who pay the gas taxes, and to a much smaller percentage of those who use bus. But why would that be of any consequence to the DOT's choices in how the gas tax is spent? After all, none of them are elected or are fireable? I have often joked about getting job with the DOT so that I wouldn't have to work until I retired...
Tuesday, September 20, 2005
The world has lost a great warrior
After decades of persuing Nazi war criminals, Mr. Wiesenthal finally gets to rest in peace.
Let us remember his efforts to keep the memory of the Holocaust alive, and his fight against anti-Semitism. Let us all pick up the torch that he carried for so long.
Let us remember his efforts to keep the memory of the Holocaust alive, and his fight against anti-Semitism. Let us all pick up the torch that he carried for so long.
Sunday, September 18, 2005
Monumental surrender
The winning design for the Flight 93 Memorial has stirred controversy and outrage, with it's crescent of maple trees, which is the symbol of the faith of the hijackers.
In this piece, Michelle Malkin offers up her scathing opinion of this.
In this piece, Michelle Malkin offers up her scathing opinion of this.
How will the cities be rebuilt?
In the rebuilding of the Gulf Coast cities, how will that be done? Will the cities be rebuilt as they were, or is this the opportunity to start with a "clean slate", and create places that, as Mark Trahant says in this piece, are places where everybody wants to come?
Only time will tell, of course, but my hope is that both the citizens of the region, and the local, state and federal government officials will sit down and seriously consider exactly what should be done, and how they will go about it. Only a serious discussion will enable them to avoid the mistakes of the past.
Only time will tell, of course, but my hope is that both the citizens of the region, and the local, state and federal government officials will sit down and seriously consider exactly what should be done, and how they will go about it. Only a serious discussion will enable them to avoid the mistakes of the past.
Afghan polls close without much violence
As reported here, after decades of violent turmoil, the Afghan people turned out to vote for their representatives in the lower house of their government.
After a slow turnout in the morning, things picked up, with thousands of Afghani's turning out to vote, and as they did in Iraq, after voting, they dipped their fingers in indelible ink to both prove they voted and to prevent double voting.
Oh, yeah, one other thing that didn't happen on this historic day in Afghanistan. There were no major attacks by remnants of the Taliban, as they had vowed. I guess the presence of about 100,000 Afghani troops and police, along with about 30,000 foreign troops, may have made the thugs think twice about showing their faces.
I think President Hamid Karzai spoke eloquently well, when he said, "We are making history. It's the day of self-determination for the Afghan people. After 30 years of wars, interventions, occupations and misery, today Afghanistan is moving forward, making an economy, making political institutions."
And to think some lunatics in our country don't want to see something like this happen, either in Afghanistan, or in Iraq.
After a slow turnout in the morning, things picked up, with thousands of Afghani's turning out to vote, and as they did in Iraq, after voting, they dipped their fingers in indelible ink to both prove they voted and to prevent double voting.
Oh, yeah, one other thing that didn't happen on this historic day in Afghanistan. There were no major attacks by remnants of the Taliban, as they had vowed. I guess the presence of about 100,000 Afghani troops and police, along with about 30,000 foreign troops, may have made the thugs think twice about showing their faces.
I think President Hamid Karzai spoke eloquently well, when he said, "We are making history. It's the day of self-determination for the Afghan people. After 30 years of wars, interventions, occupations and misery, today Afghanistan is moving forward, making an economy, making political institutions."
And to think some lunatics in our country don't want to see something like this happen, either in Afghanistan, or in Iraq.
State economic forecasters project $1.1 billion surplus
When the former Attorney General stole the election took office as Governor, there was great wailing and knashing of teeth about a "budget crisis" for the state of Washington, resulting in "emergency" enactment of a veritable plethora of new taxes, most notable of which are on soda pop, Spam (the original Spam, not the junk you get in your e-mail), candy, cigarettes, and, oh yes, we can't forget the new gas tax either, all of which the Dem dominated legislature passed with obvious glee.
Well, guess what? According to this article, state economic forecasters are predicting a $1.1 billion dollar surplus. That sure doesn't sound like our state budget is in a crisis, now does it? Now where do you suppose all that "extra" money came from? Must be from all the candy, soda, booze, and cigarettes, not to mention gas, that we here in Washington are consuming.
Budget crisis? What budget crisis?
Well, guess what? According to this article, state economic forecasters are predicting a $1.1 billion dollar surplus. That sure doesn't sound like our state budget is in a crisis, now does it? Now where do you suppose all that "extra" money came from? Must be from all the candy, soda, booze, and cigarettes, not to mention gas, that we here in Washington are consuming.
Budget crisis? What budget crisis?
Feds not first in line for blame
In the wake of Hurricane Katrina and the devastation it caused, comes the finger pointing, and people playing the "blame game". This needs to stop, folks.
If you don't have an understanding of the processes for disaster relief, and who is responsible to do what and when, Julia Youngs lays it out for you in this piece.
Once again, Julia gets it right.
If you don't have an understanding of the processes for disaster relief, and who is responsible to do what and when, Julia Youngs lays it out for you in this piece.
Once again, Julia gets it right.
Once again, the P-I editorial board is wrong
In this piece, they are bemoaning the "silence" from state and local government officials regarding I-912, the gas tax appeal initiative.
Where the P-I editorial board is wrong, is that, instead of calling for more taxes, and more spending - as they have been doing for months now - they should be calling for fiscal restraint and responsible spending. With the existing 28 cent per gallon gas tax, and the amount of driving people around here do, with more efficient use of revenues raised through the existing tax, maintenance of infrastructure, along with new construction, can be done.
But, as usual, the P-I editorial board (along with most politicians) just doesn't understand the concepts of fiscal restraint and responsible spending. Makes me wonder how many over draft fees they incur on their own checking account, you know?
Where the P-I editorial board is wrong, is that, instead of calling for more taxes, and more spending - as they have been doing for months now - they should be calling for fiscal restraint and responsible spending. With the existing 28 cent per gallon gas tax, and the amount of driving people around here do, with more efficient use of revenues raised through the existing tax, maintenance of infrastructure, along with new construction, can be done.
But, as usual, the P-I editorial board (along with most politicians) just doesn't understand the concepts of fiscal restraint and responsible spending. Makes me wonder how many over draft fees they incur on their own checking account, you know?
Tuesday, September 13, 2005
A very moving 9/11 memory
Below are the memories of a friend of mine, Debbie, who details some things that she went through on that horrific day, and later. When I first read what she wrote, I was very moved, and couldn't help but shed a few tears as I was taken back to that terrible day, and my own memories.
By the way, Debbie's husband Mike, is serving our country in Afghanistan. Your thoughts and prayers for Mike, and for all those who are serving in harms way, will be greatly, and humbly, appreciated.
Thank you, Debbie, for so graciously allowing me to post this here.
And now, Debbie's moving rememberance.
I had gotten up particularly early that day for some reason. I was on my back porch gathering my thoughts for the day when the phone rang. It was my mom, “Debbie! Turn on Fox News – a plane just flew into the World Trade Center!”
I stayed on the phone, stepped through the glass sliding door and was instantly at my television. My mother and I were talking about the first plane that hit, wondering what in the world happened. Was it an accident? Was the pilot drunk or sick? We were just wondering, questioning each other while we were watching the tower burn. It seems like it was no time and together we watched the second plane plow into the second tower. We were dumbfounded. I remember we both screamed. That time I ran into the bedroom and woke up my husband, who had not been in bed very long. He came out and we watched it together: the flames, people jumping from the buildings and the towers falling down. I remember watching that big cloud of dirt and debris chasing the people down the street that were running for their lives. I remember seeing the police and the firemen running into what would ultimately be their deaths, instead of running away like I’m pretty sure I would have done. I’m ashamed to admit it, but I’m a coward like that. I’m sure my first inclination would be to run like hell. I remember being in awe at how they did that.
At some point, my mother and I hung up and my husband and I just sat there and watched it all day. I remember I went through many emotions that day, but I didn’t cry. It was a long, long time before I cried.
The next evening my husband came to me and told me he had something he wanted to talk to me about. We sat in the family room and he told me that he wanted to join the Army again, but was pretty sure they wouldn’t take him. So he decided he would try the National Guard. Mike was almost 46 years old the day he told me he wanted to rejoin. I asked him why he wanted to do that. He said, “Deb, we’ve been attacked. We’ll be going to war and I want to do my part. I’ve trained for half my adult life for war and now it’s time to use that training.” I was so numb from emotion that I could barely speak. But I did manage to say, “I understand. If that’s what you want to do, then I support you 100%.”
He had to lose a LOT of weight before the National Guard would take him – almost 80 pounds. I had watched his weight seesaw back and forth for 21 years, but I had never seen him so determined. He lost the weight and in June 2002 he threw up his right hand and swore to protect and defend the United States of America.
I said I didn’t cry for a long, long time. At that time I worked for my church doing volunteer administrative work at home. I made tracts, kept the church directory and miscellaneous typing/computer things – just little things like that. About a week before the 1st anniversary of 9-11, the church secretary called and asked me if I would type 3,000 names so we could put them on little flags to pass out to the congregation. The 3,000 names were the victims of 9-11. It was then that I cried: typing all of those names, one after the other after the other. It’s not that it was not real for me before, but I think I was still just so numb. I remember in June or July wondering, “Why haven’t you cried? Are you that heartless? You haven’t shed a tear.” I wrestled with that for months. Then, once I started crying, I couldn’t stop. All of the anger, frustration, and heart breaking, crushing emotion came forth in a river of tears that I could not stop. I had to force myself to continue typing all those names. I think for every stroke of the keyboard, I shed two tears. I cried until I couldn’t cry anymore that day. But I still cry sometimes when I think about it.
I don’t only cry for the victims of 9-11 or their families. I cry for my country as I look around me on the news; people in my extended family and friends that just don’t get it. I cry for the appeasers of Islamofascism and the political correctness of the day.
I stay at home with all of my creature comforts, safe and sound, as my husband is half way around the world defending the rights of Cindy Sheehan and Michael Moore and all of the people that would just as soon spit on him as to shake his hand and say anything encouraging to him or his fellow service men and women. Sometimes I lay awake at night begging God to protect him and bring him home safely to me, all in one piece and then I turn on the television or read an article on the internet where Code Pink is protesting our wounded soldiers at Walter Reed. Or I get the privilege of seeing Jesse Jackson sucking up to a monster like Hugo Chavez, while calling our President a racist. And then I get to see Cindy Sheehan trashing the memory of her brave son and trying her damndest to make all those brave men and women that have died in Iraq to have died in vain. Yes. They all have that right and I will not deny them that right. But I have the right to be as mad as hell over it, too, and to think of them as traitors and appeasers.
I am not a warmonger. I abhor violence. But I believe there are things worth fighting for and 9-11 was certainly one of those times.
By the way, Debbie's husband Mike, is serving our country in Afghanistan. Your thoughts and prayers for Mike, and for all those who are serving in harms way, will be greatly, and humbly, appreciated.
Thank you, Debbie, for so graciously allowing me to post this here.
And now, Debbie's moving rememberance.
I had gotten up particularly early that day for some reason. I was on my back porch gathering my thoughts for the day when the phone rang. It was my mom, “Debbie! Turn on Fox News – a plane just flew into the World Trade Center!”
I stayed on the phone, stepped through the glass sliding door and was instantly at my television. My mother and I were talking about the first plane that hit, wondering what in the world happened. Was it an accident? Was the pilot drunk or sick? We were just wondering, questioning each other while we were watching the tower burn. It seems like it was no time and together we watched the second plane plow into the second tower. We were dumbfounded. I remember we both screamed. That time I ran into the bedroom and woke up my husband, who had not been in bed very long. He came out and we watched it together: the flames, people jumping from the buildings and the towers falling down. I remember watching that big cloud of dirt and debris chasing the people down the street that were running for their lives. I remember seeing the police and the firemen running into what would ultimately be their deaths, instead of running away like I’m pretty sure I would have done. I’m ashamed to admit it, but I’m a coward like that. I’m sure my first inclination would be to run like hell. I remember being in awe at how they did that.
At some point, my mother and I hung up and my husband and I just sat there and watched it all day. I remember I went through many emotions that day, but I didn’t cry. It was a long, long time before I cried.
The next evening my husband came to me and told me he had something he wanted to talk to me about. We sat in the family room and he told me that he wanted to join the Army again, but was pretty sure they wouldn’t take him. So he decided he would try the National Guard. Mike was almost 46 years old the day he told me he wanted to rejoin. I asked him why he wanted to do that. He said, “Deb, we’ve been attacked. We’ll be going to war and I want to do my part. I’ve trained for half my adult life for war and now it’s time to use that training.” I was so numb from emotion that I could barely speak. But I did manage to say, “I understand. If that’s what you want to do, then I support you 100%.”
He had to lose a LOT of weight before the National Guard would take him – almost 80 pounds. I had watched his weight seesaw back and forth for 21 years, but I had never seen him so determined. He lost the weight and in June 2002 he threw up his right hand and swore to protect and defend the United States of America.
I said I didn’t cry for a long, long time. At that time I worked for my church doing volunteer administrative work at home. I made tracts, kept the church directory and miscellaneous typing/computer things – just little things like that. About a week before the 1st anniversary of 9-11, the church secretary called and asked me if I would type 3,000 names so we could put them on little flags to pass out to the congregation. The 3,000 names were the victims of 9-11. It was then that I cried: typing all of those names, one after the other after the other. It’s not that it was not real for me before, but I think I was still just so numb. I remember in June or July wondering, “Why haven’t you cried? Are you that heartless? You haven’t shed a tear.” I wrestled with that for months. Then, once I started crying, I couldn’t stop. All of the anger, frustration, and heart breaking, crushing emotion came forth in a river of tears that I could not stop. I had to force myself to continue typing all those names. I think for every stroke of the keyboard, I shed two tears. I cried until I couldn’t cry anymore that day. But I still cry sometimes when I think about it.
I don’t only cry for the victims of 9-11 or their families. I cry for my country as I look around me on the news; people in my extended family and friends that just don’t get it. I cry for the appeasers of Islamofascism and the political correctness of the day.
I stay at home with all of my creature comforts, safe and sound, as my husband is half way around the world defending the rights of Cindy Sheehan and Michael Moore and all of the people that would just as soon spit on him as to shake his hand and say anything encouraging to him or his fellow service men and women. Sometimes I lay awake at night begging God to protect him and bring him home safely to me, all in one piece and then I turn on the television or read an article on the internet where Code Pink is protesting our wounded soldiers at Walter Reed. Or I get the privilege of seeing Jesse Jackson sucking up to a monster like Hugo Chavez, while calling our President a racist. And then I get to see Cindy Sheehan trashing the memory of her brave son and trying her damndest to make all those brave men and women that have died in Iraq to have died in vain. Yes. They all have that right and I will not deny them that right. But I have the right to be as mad as hell over it, too, and to think of them as traitors and appeasers.
I am not a warmonger. I abhor violence. But I believe there are things worth fighting for and 9-11 was certainly one of those times.
Sunday, September 11, 2005
Hurricane Katrina victims still need your help
Although much has been done, much still needs doing. Please help by donating what you are able to, to organizations who are on the 'front lines', doing what they can. Here are four links.
The American Red Cross
The Salvation Army
Mercy Corps
AmeriCares
The American Red Cross
The Salvation Army
Mercy Corps
AmeriCares
Never Forget
Today, September 11, 2005 marks the fourth anniversary of the attack, not only on our nation, but on our very way of life by “people” bound and determined to enslave not only us, but the entire world.
These “people” want to return us to the time where they controlled vast swaths of the world, imposing their will, and their so-called “Religion of Peace”, through the sword. This is something that we cannot, must not, allow to happen. If a modern, free society, is to survive, we must fight these “people” at every turn, and never surrender. For if we surrender, we shall die.
Yet, there are those in our society who think that these “people” can be appeased, and that if appeased, they will stop the violence that they inflict upon the world. This is a fallacy, born of a “head in the sand” type of wishful thinking.
Neville Chamberlain found that out in 1939, when he attempted to appease one of the vilest monsters that has ever walked this earth, Adolph Hitler, when he proclaimed upon his return to London, “Peace in our time!”. Because of Chamberlain’s ill-fated attempt at appeasing Hitler, countless millions were soon subjugated under the jack boots of the Nazi regime, resulting in the deaths of countless millions more, as the world convulsed in total war.
Just as Adolph Hitler wanted the power to dominate the world, imposing his will, so these “people” want to dominate the world, so they may impose their will upon everyone. Whether you realize it or not, the truth of the matter is that we are once again embroiled in a world war, one that we must win, whatever the cost, if our society, our very way of life is to survive.
On this fourth anniversary, take a moment to reflect on what is at stake, for much is at stake. Do not take the freedoms that we enjoy for granted, for if we lose this war, we will lose those freedoms, which is the ultimate goal of those “people”.
I would rather stand and fight as a free man, and risk the possibility of death, rather than surrender and guarantee my death as a slave.
Never forget.
These “people” want to return us to the time where they controlled vast swaths of the world, imposing their will, and their so-called “Religion of Peace”, through the sword. This is something that we cannot, must not, allow to happen. If a modern, free society, is to survive, we must fight these “people” at every turn, and never surrender. For if we surrender, we shall die.
Yet, there are those in our society who think that these “people” can be appeased, and that if appeased, they will stop the violence that they inflict upon the world. This is a fallacy, born of a “head in the sand” type of wishful thinking.
Neville Chamberlain found that out in 1939, when he attempted to appease one of the vilest monsters that has ever walked this earth, Adolph Hitler, when he proclaimed upon his return to London, “Peace in our time!”. Because of Chamberlain’s ill-fated attempt at appeasing Hitler, countless millions were soon subjugated under the jack boots of the Nazi regime, resulting in the deaths of countless millions more, as the world convulsed in total war.
Just as Adolph Hitler wanted the power to dominate the world, imposing his will, so these “people” want to dominate the world, so they may impose their will upon everyone. Whether you realize it or not, the truth of the matter is that we are once again embroiled in a world war, one that we must win, whatever the cost, if our society, our very way of life is to survive.
On this fourth anniversary, take a moment to reflect on what is at stake, for much is at stake. Do not take the freedoms that we enjoy for granted, for if we lose this war, we will lose those freedoms, which is the ultimate goal of those “people”.
I would rather stand and fight as a free man, and risk the possibility of death, rather than surrender and guarantee my death as a slave.
Never forget.
Annan failed to stop corruption in UN
As reported here, after a year, the Volcker Commission comes to the conclusion that Annan could have, and should have, stopped the corruption in the UN, but didn't, and that the UN "is inefficient, overpoliticized, corrupt, and in desperate need of immediate repair."
It took them a year to figure this out? Heck, they could have saved (or paid me) the $32 million they spent just by asking me.
It took them a year to figure this out? Heck, they could have saved (or paid me) the $32 million they spent just by asking me.
Monday, September 05, 2005
Nations across the world responding to US disaster
I posted earlier that as of Friday, on 25 nations had made offers of assistance, most of which were paltry. Well, folks, the other nations of the world are beginning to step up to the plate with offers of assistance that are far from paltry, including nations still recovering from the devastating tsunami, and Afghanistan.
All I can say, is a heartfelt thank you.
Hat tip: Supedujour
Judge Roberts nominated for Chief Justice
Judge Roberts nominated for Chief Justice.
Not even confirmed yet, Judge Roberts has been nominated by President Bush to succeed the late Judge Rehnquist as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. I'm actually quite surprised by this, in light of the fact that Judge Thomas or Judge Scalia have sat on the court for many years, and either one of them could have filled the position with distinction.
Of course, now the Dems are saying that Judge Roberts must be held to a higher standard, with Dem Senate leader Reid saying, "The Senate must be vigilant." [Emphasis mine]
There are two things wrong with these statements.
One is that, aren't judges nominated for the Supreme Court already held to the highest standard, as opposed to the standards for say, a nominee for an appellate position? If nominees for the Supreme Court are already held to the highest standards, how high of a standard do they want, anyway? I mean, come on - that's illogical! Oh, wait ... there I go again, expecting logic to be applied. We are, after all, talking about the Dems here. Silly me!
The second is, "The Senate must be vigilant." Vigilant? Against what? A judge that interprets laws based on what the Constitution actually says, rather than what he thinks it should say? Oh, please. Note to Dems - interpreting laws based on what the Constitution says is the job of the Supreme Court, not legislating from the bench, making up laws on the fly based on how they feel, or what they think the Constitution says.
Up to now, I haven't commented very much on the nomination of Judge Roberts, as I don't have a background in law, and therefore haven't felt, well, qualified if you will, to speak to that. But, watching the Dems and their leftist cohorts foaming at the mouth trying everything in their power to block his nomination through innuendo and outright lies, I have come to the conclusion that Judge Roberts will make a fine Supremem Court Judge, and by extension, a fine Chief Justice.
Not even confirmed yet, Judge Roberts has been nominated by President Bush to succeed the late Judge Rehnquist as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. I'm actually quite surprised by this, in light of the fact that Judge Thomas or Judge Scalia have sat on the court for many years, and either one of them could have filled the position with distinction.
Of course, now the Dems are saying that Judge Roberts must be held to a higher standard, with Dem Senate leader Reid saying, "The Senate must be vigilant." [Emphasis mine]
There are two things wrong with these statements.
One is that, aren't judges nominated for the Supreme Court already held to the highest standard, as opposed to the standards for say, a nominee for an appellate position? If nominees for the Supreme Court are already held to the highest standards, how high of a standard do they want, anyway? I mean, come on - that's illogical! Oh, wait ... there I go again, expecting logic to be applied. We are, after all, talking about the Dems here. Silly me!
The second is, "The Senate must be vigilant." Vigilant? Against what? A judge that interprets laws based on what the Constitution actually says, rather than what he thinks it should say? Oh, please. Note to Dems - interpreting laws based on what the Constitution says is the job of the Supreme Court, not legislating from the bench, making up laws on the fly based on how they feel, or what they think the Constitution says.
Up to now, I haven't commented very much on the nomination of Judge Roberts, as I don't have a background in law, and therefore haven't felt, well, qualified if you will, to speak to that. But, watching the Dems and their leftist cohorts foaming at the mouth trying everything in their power to block his nomination through innuendo and outright lies, I have come to the conclusion that Judge Roberts will make a fine Supremem Court Judge, and by extension, a fine Chief Justice.
Sunday, September 04, 2005
Chief Justice Rehnquist dies at age 80
Although not a total shock, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, William H. Rehnquist has died at the age of 80, after battling thyroid cancer.
The Washington Times has an informative article here, and Yahoo has an entire page dedicated to links regarding his passing, and his life.
Who will be the next Chief Justice? President Bush has an opportunity to shape the direction of the court for many years to come with his decision. Let's just hope and pray that he makes the right decision.
The Washington Times has an informative article here, and Yahoo has an entire page dedicated to links regarding his passing, and his life.
Who will be the next Chief Justice? President Bush has an opportunity to shape the direction of the court for many years to come with his decision. Let's just hope and pray that he makes the right decision.
A new addition to our links
A great new addition to our links is Bear Politics. The Bear has a terrific blog, which I encourage everyone to go check out, and not just because he has linked to us, which he has graciously done - thanks Bear! - but because of his insights, which are worth reading.
When you do check out his blog, tell him I sent ya. :)
When you do check out his blog, tell him I sent ya. :)
Shameful
As reported here, as of this past Friday, only 25 nations have offered help to the US in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, with only China having donated any actual dollars ($100,000.00 to the ARC) so far, and from what I've read in other sources, the offers of "help" have been paltry in comparison to the need.
Granted, the US is the richest nation, with the greatest resources available, but still. It's the principle of the thing, you know? Who is it that is first to offer both material and economic assitance to other nations during a catastrophe? The US. Who is it that is usually first on the scene? The US. Who is it that never imposes conditions on the assistance offered? The US.
Then why is it that, as of Friday, only 26 nations had made any offers of assistance?
It's shameful. Plain and simply shameful.
Granted, the US is the richest nation, with the greatest resources available, but still. It's the principle of the thing, you know? Who is it that is first to offer both material and economic assitance to other nations during a catastrophe? The US. Who is it that is usually first on the scene? The US. Who is it that never imposes conditions on the assistance offered? The US.
Then why is it that, as of Friday, only 26 nations had made any offers of assistance?
It's shameful. Plain and simply shameful.
Opponents to I-912 slow to get started
As reported here, pro gas tax groups have been slow "getting off the dime" in opposing I-912, which would repeal the onerous 9.5 cent per gallon tax increase passed (by "emergency" decree, no less, thwarting any possibility of a citizens referendum on this) by our Dem dominated state legislature.
House Transportation Committee Chairman, Ed Murray (D-Seattle - what else?), said that, "The silence is rather interesting at this late date in the game.", adding, "Alan Mullay (executive VP of Boeing) and John Rindlaub (former president of the greater Seattle Chamber of Commerce) stated after the nickel passage that it wasn't good enough and the Legislature hasn't gone far enough to fix transportation, " adding further, "And now we've gone further than everybody's wildest transportation dreams. It's time for them to step up and perform the same sort of miracle at the ballot as we did in the Legislature."
Everybody's wildest transportation dreams? Obviously Mr. Murray is only including Dems in that "Everybody" statement, as this gas tax bill was opposed by Reps in both the House and the Senate.
Miracle? The only "miracle" that occured in the legislature is that the Dems had enough votes to pass this new tax by declaring an emergency, thereby negating a People's Referendum on it. So, Mr. Murray wants those who are for the new gas tax to perform the same type of "miracle", which to me sounds like he wants to deny the people of the State of Washington a voice in how, not to mention how much, they are taxed.
Mr. Murray, it seems, is following the new "motto" of the DNC - Lie, Cheat, and Steal. Do whatever it takes to win. Mr. Murray also seems to have forgotten one thing - the people.
We demand a voice, Mr. Murray, in how this state is run, whether it be through laws passed in the legislature, through referendum, or by the initiative process. You would do well to remember that.
House Transportation Committee Chairman, Ed Murray (D-Seattle - what else?), said that, "The silence is rather interesting at this late date in the game.", adding, "Alan Mullay (executive VP of Boeing) and John Rindlaub (former president of the greater Seattle Chamber of Commerce) stated after the nickel passage that it wasn't good enough and the Legislature hasn't gone far enough to fix transportation, " adding further, "And now we've gone further than everybody's wildest transportation dreams. It's time for them to step up and perform the same sort of miracle at the ballot as we did in the Legislature."
Everybody's wildest transportation dreams? Obviously Mr. Murray is only including Dems in that "Everybody" statement, as this gas tax bill was opposed by Reps in both the House and the Senate.
Miracle? The only "miracle" that occured in the legislature is that the Dems had enough votes to pass this new tax by declaring an emergency, thereby negating a People's Referendum on it. So, Mr. Murray wants those who are for the new gas tax to perform the same type of "miracle", which to me sounds like he wants to deny the people of the State of Washington a voice in how, not to mention how much, they are taxed.
Mr. Murray, it seems, is following the new "motto" of the DNC - Lie, Cheat, and Steal. Do whatever it takes to win. Mr. Murray also seems to have forgotten one thing - the people.
We demand a voice, Mr. Murray, in how this state is run, whether it be through laws passed in the legislature, through referendum, or by the initiative process. You would do well to remember that.
Issaquah City Ordinance being challenged in court
As I first reported here, the City of Issaquah was to vote on an ordinance restricting where convicted sex offenders could live within the city limits, in an effort to keep them as far as possible away from children.
Well, the ordinance passed, and went into effect on September 1st, but as reported here, this ordinace is being challenged in court by - you guessed it - those "defenders of the oppressed (including convicted sex offenders)", the ACLU.
They are challenging this on the grounds that this ordinance is "unconstitutional" in that it violates the rights of the sex offenders to live wherever they please, stating that it is "cruel and unusual punishment" to make them live where there aren't any children around that they can prey upon.
What about the rights of children to not be victims of sexual predation? What about the rights of the parents of those children, to have their children not live in fear of being sexually assaulted? What about that, ACLU?
The ACLU supposedly defends those who are not able to defend themselves, right? Well, doesn't that include children, who are among the least able to defend themselves?
The ACLU is one of the most morally reprehensible organizations inflicting this planet, insinuating their morally bankrupt agenda into nearly every facet of civilized society, and they need to be confronted, and hopefully stopped, every time they attempt to do something like this.
Note to the judge(s) who will be hearing this case - consider very carefully which way you decide the outcome of this lawsuit, by taking into consideration the very real vulnerability of the children this ordinance strives to protect, versus the so-called "rights" of convicted sexual predators to live in close proximity to children that they could prey upon.
Well, the ordinance passed, and went into effect on September 1st, but as reported here, this ordinace is being challenged in court by - you guessed it - those "defenders of the oppressed (including convicted sex offenders)", the ACLU.
They are challenging this on the grounds that this ordinance is "unconstitutional" in that it violates the rights of the sex offenders to live wherever they please, stating that it is "cruel and unusual punishment" to make them live where there aren't any children around that they can prey upon.
What about the rights of children to not be victims of sexual predation? What about the rights of the parents of those children, to have their children not live in fear of being sexually assaulted? What about that, ACLU?
The ACLU supposedly defends those who are not able to defend themselves, right? Well, doesn't that include children, who are among the least able to defend themselves?
The ACLU is one of the most morally reprehensible organizations inflicting this planet, insinuating their morally bankrupt agenda into nearly every facet of civilized society, and they need to be confronted, and hopefully stopped, every time they attempt to do something like this.
Note to the judge(s) who will be hearing this case - consider very carefully which way you decide the outcome of this lawsuit, by taking into consideration the very real vulnerability of the children this ordinance strives to protect, versus the so-called "rights" of convicted sexual predators to live in close proximity to children that they could prey upon.
KC Elections supervisor may be fired
As reported here, KC Elections Director Dean Logan may fire the absentee-ballot supervisor, Nicole Way because of the foul ups with absentee-ballots in 2002, 2003, and 2004.
A brief recap of the foul ups - absentee-ballots not being mailed in time to overseas voters; absentee-ballot envelopes being sent out with no ballots inside; not finding 96 ballots in time to count them last November; failing to find valid signatures on file, but counting those ballots anyway; and improperly reporting the tabulation of absentee-ballots.
Now, I don't know about you, but I know that if I had made that many consistant errors in my job (and lied about it), I would have been fired long ago! Why it has taken Dean Logan so long to come to this conclusion is beyond me!
Hopefully, more "heads will roll", including Dean Logan's.
A brief recap of the foul ups - absentee-ballots not being mailed in time to overseas voters; absentee-ballot envelopes being sent out with no ballots inside; not finding 96 ballots in time to count them last November; failing to find valid signatures on file, but counting those ballots anyway; and improperly reporting the tabulation of absentee-ballots.
Now, I don't know about you, but I know that if I had made that many consistant errors in my job (and lied about it), I would have been fired long ago! Why it has taken Dean Logan so long to come to this conclusion is beyond me!
Hopefully, more "heads will roll", including Dean Logan's.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)